Maybe he'll have a drink with me
The election is approaching too fast now. We’ve watched for what seems like years as the debates and the primaries raged on. We took forever to whittle down to two people for President, and now we have less than two months from the conventions to the election to figure out what we need to see to make our choices. That really wasn’t an issue for me as we knew these people inside and out because of the process. We now, though, have a candidate for VP that nobody knows, and the system broke again.
There is truly a lot to say about all of that, I know. Today, though, I have a related thing about which to rant.
I again recently heard people talking about how important it is to vote for somebody who relates well to the common man. In the last two elections the phrase was that we needed to vote for the person you would more like to have beers with. We got George Bush and it was hailed as a real victory for the idea of getting the guy who seems most like us.
I’ve been thinking about the ‘guy you would like most to have beers with’ thought because I heard it again yesterday by a McCain supporter. You know the line. Obama is an elitist, doesn’t understand good working folk, etc. It is good political banter, and it’s worked for a while as we’ve already said.
I don’t really know if anybody takes that stuff seriously though. In truth, the whole thing is probably code for something else, but what if some voters took to heart the ‘I would rather have a beer with him, so I should vote for him’ baloney?
Many of you know me. Many of you know that I have had beers with a wide variety and a large number of people in my life. I know ‘beer ’ stuff. I think you know I know ‘beer’ stuff. Here’s what I don’t get:
Most of the people I have had beers with are by and large the last people I would want to lead this great country. Most of the people I have had beers with would be the most likely to start a war with a country that never attacked or threatened us. They would make up reasons for doing so. They would yell things like “Bring it on” toward other countries when they don’t know what else to say. They would dress up in costume and hold a party for Mission Accomplished when the war is really just starting. They would throw away the ideas of negotiation and diplomacy as possible foreign relations tools.
They would give us the incomprehensible situation we find ourselves in now.
Just what is the problem with voting for the smartest people? On the list of criteria a voter uses to choose the POTUS why wouldn’t ‘Smartest’ be the first thing on the list? Not the only thing, but surely the first thing. “Let’s see. This guy sounds brilliant. The other guy can’t put together a coherent sentence with a speechwriter and a teleprompter, but I think he drinks beer. I guess I should just call the brilliant guy ‘too eloquent to be President’ and vote for the other guy.”
This has to stop.
What are the criteria YOU use to figure out voting? Faculty and Staff | Dane Copti
Monday, September 08, 2008 5:27:42 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  |
|